Publications
1.
Reynolds, K.M.
2001a. Using a logic framework to assess forest ecosystem sustainability.
Journal of Forestry 99:26-30. PDF
2.
Reynolds, K.M.
2001b. Fuzzy logic knowledge bases in integrated landscape assessment: examples
and possibilities. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-521. Portland, OR: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 24 p. PDF
3.
Reynolds, K.M.
2002a. Landscape evaluation and planning with EMDS 3.0. 2002 ESRI User
Conference. San Diego, CA. July 9–12, 2002. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems
Research Institute. PDF
4.
Reynolds, K.M.
2002b. Logic models as frameworks for thinking about compatibility. Pages
215-224 in Johnson, D.; Haynes, R., eds. Proceedings of the Wood Compatibility
Workshop. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-563. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. PDF
5.
Reynolds, K.M.
2003. A logic approach to design specifications for integrated application of
diverse models in forest ecosystem analysis. Pages 379-385 in: Amaro, A., Reed,
D. and Soares, P. (eds). Modelling Forest Systems. CABI Publishing,
Wallingford, UK.
6.
Reynolds, K.M.
2005b. Integrated decision support for sustainable forest management in the
United States: fact or fiction? Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
49:6-23. PDF
7.
Reynolds, K.M.
2005c. EMDS 3.0: A Modeling Framework for Coping with Complexity in
Environmental Assessment and Planning PDF
8.
Reynolds, K.M.,
and P.F. Hessburg. 2014. An overview of the Ecosystem
Management Decision-Support system. Chapter 1 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). Decision Support for Environmental Management: Applications of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
9.
Saunders, M.C,
and B.J. Miller. 2014 NetWeaver. Chapter 2 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). Decision Support for Environmental Management: Applications of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
10.
Murphy, P.J.
2014. Criterium DecisionPlus. Chapter 3 in Reynolds,
K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). Decision Support for Environmental Management: Applications of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin: Springer. [ PDF]
11.
Paplanus, S., B.
Miller, P. Murphy, K. Reynolds, and M.Saunders.
2014. EMDS 5.0 and Beyond. Chapter 13 in Reynolds,
K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). Decision Support for Environmental Management: Applications of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
12.
Reynolds, K.M.,
P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron.
2014. Synthesis and new directions. Chapter 14 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). Decision Support for Environmental Management: Applications of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
13.
Reynolds, K., S.
Paplanus, B. Miller, and P. Murphy. 2015. Design features behind success of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System and future development. Forests
6:27-46. PDF
14.
Marcot, B.G., and K.M. Reynolds. 2019. EMDS has a GeNIe with a SMILE. Newsletter of the Australian Bayesian
Network Modelling Society. August 2019, 12-15. PDF
15.
Marcot, B.G., and K.M. Reynolds. 2019. EMDS has a GeNIe with a SMILE. Newsletter of the Australian Bayesian
Network Modelling Society. August 2019, 12-15. PDF
16.
Marcot, B.G., and K.M. Reynolds. 2019. EMDS has a GeNIe with a SMILE. PNW Research Note PNW-RN581. U.S.
Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station,
Portland, OR. [1]
17.
Reynolds, K.M.,
P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). 2014. Making Transparent Environmental Management Decisions:
Applications of the Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin:
Springer. Available online
18.
Wang, J., J.
Chen, W. Ju, and M. Li. 2010. IA-SDSS: A GIS-based land use decision support
system with consideration of carbon sequestration. Environmental Modelling
& Software 25: 539–553. PDF
19.
Manzuli, A.G. 2005. Knowledge-based monitoring and
evaluation system of land Use: assessing the ecosystem conservation status in
the influence area of a gas pipeline in Bolivia. Doctoral dissertation.
Göttingen: Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. PDF
20.
White, M.D.,
Heilman, G.E. Jr., and Stallcup, J.E. 2005. Science
assessment for the Sierra Checkerboard Initiative Archived 2011-07-25
at the Wayback Machine. Conservation Biology Institute, Encinitas, CA.
21.
Humphries, H.C.,
P.S. Bourgeron, and K.M. Reynolds. 2008. Suitability
for conservation as a criterion in regional conservation network selection.
Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 467-492.online Archived 2013-02-02
at archive.today
22.
Staus, N.L., J.R. Strittholt, and
D.A. Dellasala. 2010. Evaluating areas of high
conservation value in Western Oregon with a decision-support model.
Conservation Biology 24: 711–720. PDF
23.
White, M.D., and
J.R. Strittholt. 2014. Forest conservation planning.
Chapter 9 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron (eds). Decision Support for Environmental
Management: Applications of the Ecosystem Management Decision Support System.
Berlin: Springer. PDF
24.
Povak, P.A., C.P. Giardina, P.F. Hessburg, K.M. Reynolds, R.B. Salter, C. Heider, E. Salminen, and R. MacKenzie. 2020.
A decision support tool for the conservation of tropical forest and nearshore
environments on Babeldaob Island, Palau. Forest
Ecology and Management 476. PDF
25.
Bourgeron, P.S., H.C. Humphries, and K.M. Reynolds. 2003.
Conducting large-scale conservation evaluation and conservation area selection
using a knowledge-based system and GIS framework. In: Parks, BO, Clarke KM,
Crane MP, editors. 2003. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on
Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modeling:
Problems, Prospectus, and Needs for Research. [CD-ROM, ISBN 0-9743307-0-1]. GIS/EM4
Conference; 2000 Sep 2-8; The Banff Centre, Banff, (AB) Canada. [Jointly
published] Boulder: University of Colorado - Cooperative Institute for Research
in Environmental Sciences, Denver: US Geologic Survey - Center for Biological
Informatics, and Boulder: NOAA National Geophysical Data Center - Ecosystem
Informatics. PDF
26.
Stoms, D.M., McDonald, J.M., and Davis, F.W. 2002. Fuzzy
Assessment of Land Suitability for Scientific Research Reserves. Environmental
Management 29:545-558. PDF
27.
Stoms, D.M. 2014. Ecological research reserve planning.
Chapter 8 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron (eds). Decision Support for Environmental
Management: Applications of the Ecosystem Management Decision Support System.
Berlin: Springer. PDF
28.
Abelson, E.S.,
K.M. Reynolds, P. Manley, S. Paplanus. 2021. Strategic decision support for
long-term conservation management planning. Forest Ecology and Management
497. [2]
29.
Marto, M.,IK.M. Reynolds, J.G. Borges, V.A. Bushenkov,
and S. Marques. 2018. Combining decision support approaches for optimizing the
selection of bundles of ecosystem services. Forests 9: 438-451. PDF
30.
Marques, M.,
K.M. Reynolds, S. Marques, M. Marto, S. Paplanus, and J.G. Borges. 2021. A
participatory and spatial multicriteria decision approach to prioritize the
allocation of ecosystem services to management units. Land 10. [3]
31.
Reynolds, K.M.,
Johnson, K.N.; Gordon, S.N. 2003. The science/policy interface in logic‑based
evaluation of forest ecosystem sustainability. Forest Policy and Economics
5:433-446. PDF
32.
Reynolds, K.M.
2005a. Decision support for evaluating the U.S. national criteria and
indicators for forest ecosystem sustainability. In: Aguirre-Bravo, Celedonio, et al. Eds. Monitoring Science and Technology
Symposium: Unifying Knowledge for Sustainability in the Western Hemisphere;
2004 September 20–24; Denver, CO. Proceedings RMRS-P-37CD. Odgen,
UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research
Station. Published on CD-ROM. PDF
33.
Reynolds, K.M., S.N.
Gordon, and K.N. Johnson. 2008. Using logic to evaluate forest ecosystem
sustainability. Forest Criteria and Indicators Analytical Framework and Report
Workshop. 18–21 May 2008, Joensuu, Finland. Gen. Tech Rep. WO-GTR-81.PDF
34.
Jensen, M., K.
Reynolds, U. Langner, and M. Hart. 2009. Application
of logic and decision models in sustainable ecosystem management. 2009.
Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences.
Waikoloa, Hawaii. 5–8 January 2009. PDF
35.
ChiChuan, C. and L. HunYeu. 2000.
Ecosystem management decision support system (I): planning and integration of a
geographic database (Chinese with English summary). Taiwan Journal of Forest
Science 15: 125-135.
36.
Marques, M.,
K.M. Reynolds, M. Marto, M. Lakicevic, C. Caldas,
P.J. Murphy, and J.G. Borges. 2021. Multicriteria decision analysis and group
decision-making to select stand-level forest management models and support
landscape-level collaborative planning. Forests 12. PDF
37.
Reynolds, K., P.
Murphy, and S. Paplanus. 2017. Toward geodesign for
watershed restoration on the Fremont-Winema National
Forest, Pacific Northwest, USA. Sustainability 9: 678-697. PDF
38.
Londono, O.M.C, A. Romanelli, M. Lourdes Lima, H.E. Massone, and D.E. Martínez. 2016. Fuzzy logic-based
assessment for mapping potential infiltration areas in low-gradient watersheds.
J. Environmental Management 176: 101-111. PDF
39.
Povak, N.A., P.F. Hessburg, C.P. Giardina, R.A. MacKenzie, K.M.
Reynolds, C. Heider, E. Salminen, and R.B. Salter.
2017. A Watershed decision support tool for managing invasive species on Hawaii
Island, USA. Forest Ecology and Management 400: 300-320. PDF
40.
Cheng, C.-C.
2004. Chapter 2. Pages 94–104 in T. Partap, ed.
Evolving sustainable production systems in sloping upland areas: land
classification issues and options. Tokyo: Asian Productivity. PDF
41.
Wang, S.-F.,
Y.-K. Chen, and C.-C. Cheng. 2004a. Establishment and application of forest
ecosystem management decision support system. Journal of Photogrammetry and
Remote Sensing 52: 41-52. PDF (in Chinese)
42.
Ray, D., K. Reynolds,
J. Slade, and S. Hodge. 1998. A spatial solution to Ecological Site
Classification for British Forestry using Ecosystem Management Decision
Support. Proceedings of Third International Conference on GeoComputation
Conference. Bristol, UK. September 17–19, 1998. Online
43.
Pechanec, V., J.
Brus, H. Kilianová, and I. Machar. 2015.Decision
support tool for the evaluation of landscapes. Ecological Informatics 30:
305-308. PDF
44.
Hessburg, P. F. Reynolds, K. M., Salter, R. B., and
Richmond, M. B. 2004. Using a decision support system to estimate departures of
present forest landscape patterns from historical conditions: An example from
the Inland Northwest Region of the United States. Chapter 12, In: Perera, A.H., L.J. Buse, and M.G. Weber, eds. Emulating
Natural Forest Landscape Disturbances: Concepts and Applications. Columbia
University Press, New York, NY. PDF
45.
Reynolds, K.M.,
and Hessburg, P.F. 2005. Decision support for integrated
landscape evaluation and restoration planning. Forest Ecology and Management
207:263-278. PDF
46.
Stolle, L., C. Lingnau, and J.E. Arce. 2007. Mapeamento
da fragilidade ambiental em áreas de plantios
florestais. Pages 1871–1873 in Anais XIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Florianópolis, Brasil, 21-26 abril 2007, INPE. PDF (in Portuguese)
47.
Hessburg, P.F., K.M. Reynolds, R.B. Salter, J.D. Dickinson,
W.L. Gaines, and R.J. Harrod. 2013. Landscape Evaluation for Restoration
Planning on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, USA. Sustainability 5:
805-840. PDF
48.
Bourgeron, B., H. Humphries, C. Fisher, B. Bollenbacher, and K. Reynolds. 2014. The integrated
restoration and protection strategy of USDA Forest Service Region 1: A road map
to improved planning. Chapter 5 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg,
and P.S. Bourgeron (eds). Decision Support for
Environmental Management: Applications of the Ecosystem Management Decision
Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
49.
Hessburg, P.F., R.B. Salter, K.M. Reynolds, J.D. Dickinson,
W.L. Gaines, and R.J. Harrod. 2014. Landscape evaluation and restoration
planning. Chapter 7 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg,
and P.S. Bourgeron (eds). Decision Support for
Environmental Management: Applications of the Ecosystem Management Decision
Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
50.
O’Callaghan,
Joan. 2014. Restoration Planning on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest:
Prescriptions for Resilient Landscapes. PNW Station Science Findings 162.
Portland, OR: US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Research Station. 6 pp. PDF
51.
Bollenbacher, B.L. R.T. Graham, and K.M. Reynolds. 2014.
Regional Forest Landscape Restoration Priorities: Integrating Historical
Conditions and an Uncertain Future in the Northern Rocky Mountains. J. For.
112: 474-483. PDF
52.
Okanogan-Wenatchee
National Forest. 2012 The Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest Restoration
Strategy: adaptive ecosystem management to restore landscape resiliency.
Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Region. 118 p. PDF
53.
Reynolds, K., B.
Bollenbacher, C. Fisher, M. Hart, M. Manning, E.
Henderson, and B. Sims. 2016. Decision support for the integrated restoration
and protection strategy of Forest Service Region 1. FS-1031. Portland, OR: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Published on DVD. Online
54.
Higgins, K., B.
Randle, K. Rauscher, R. Reinlasoder, and M. Webb.
2017. Snoqualmie Valley Agricultural Production District riparian restoration
and agriculture partnership building: reach scale plan. King County Department
of Natural Resources and Parks, water and land resources Division: Seattle,
WA. PDF
55.
Cleland, D., K.
Reynolds, R. Vaughan, B. Schrader, H. Li, and L. Laing. 2017. Terrestrial
condition assessment for national forests of the USDA Forest Service in the
continental US. Sustainability 9: 2144-2163. PDF or Online
56.
Cannon, J., R.
Hickey, and W. Gaines. 2018. Using GIS and the Ecosystem Management Decision
Support Tool for Forest Management on the Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest,
Washington State. Journal of Forestry 116: 460-472. PDF
57.
Anonymous. Lake
Tahoe West Landscape Restoration Strategy. PDF
58.
Lima, M.L., A.
Romanelli, H.E. Massone. 2013. Decision support model
for assessing aquifer pollution hazard and prioritizing groundwater resources
management in the wet Pampa plain, Argentina. Environmental Monitoring and
Assessment 185: 5125-5139. Online
59.
Reynolds, K.M.,
P.F. Hessburg, T. Sullivan, N. Povak,
T. McDonnell, B. Cosby, and W. Jackson. 2012. Spatial decision support for
assessing impacts of atmospheric sulfur deposition on aquatic ecosystems in the
Southern Appalachian Region. Proceedings of the 45th Hawaiian International
Conference on System Sciences. 4–7 January 2012, Maui, Hawaii. PDF
60.
Povak, N.A., P.F. Hessburg, K.M.
Reynolds, T.J. Sullivan, T.C. McDonnell. 2013. Hurdle modeling to predict
biogeochemical and climatic controls on streamwater
acidity in the Southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Water Resources Research
49: 1-16. PDF
61.
Povak, N.A., P.F. Hessburg, T.C.
McDonnell, K.M. Reynolds, T.J. Sullivan, R. B. Salter, and B.J. Cosby. 2014.
Machine learning and linear regression models to predict catchment-level base
cation weathering rates across the southern Appalachian Mountain region, USA,
Water Resources Research 50: 2798–2814. PDF
62.
McDonnell, T.C.,
T.J. Sullivan, P.F. Hessburg, K.M. Reynolds, N.A. Povak, B.J. Cosby, W. Jackson, and R.B. Salter. 2014.
Steady-state sulfur critical loads and exceedances for protection of aquatic
ecosystems in the US southern Appalachian Mountains. J. Environ. Manage. 146:
407-419. PDF
63.
Hessburg, P., Povak, N.,
Reynolds, K., and N. Vizcarra. 2015. Sour streams in
Appalachia: mapping nature’s buffer against sulfur deposition. PNW Science
Findings 175. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research
Station. PDF
64.
Reynolds, K.M.
2002c. Social acceptability of natural resource decision-making processes.
Pages 245-252 in Johnson, D.; Haynes, R., eds. Proceedings of the Wood
Compatibility Workshop. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-563. Portland, OR: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research
Station. PDF
65.
Reynolds, K.M.,
P.F. Hessburg, R.E. Miller, and R.T. Meurisse. 2011. Evaluating soil risks associated with
severe wildfire and ground-based logging. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-840.
Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
Research Station. 27 p. PDF
66.
Johnston, R.A.,
D.R. Shabazian, and S. Gao. 2002. UPlan,
a versatile urban growth model for transportation planning. Transportation
Research Record 1831: 202-209. PDF
67.
Puente, C.R.,
I.F. Diego, J.J. Ortiz Santa María. A.P. Hernando, and P.z
de Arróyabe Hernáez. 2007.
The development of a new methodology based on GIS and fuzzy logic to locate
sustainable industrial areas. 10th AGILE International Conference on Geographic
Information Science, Aalborg University, Denmark. PDF
68.
Ruiz, C. 2014.
Planning for Urban Growth and Sustainable Development. Chapter 11 in Reynolds,
K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). Decision Support for environmental Management: Applications of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
69.
Bleier, C., Downie, S., Cannata, S., Henly, R., Walker,
R., Keithley, C., Scruggs, M.; Custis, K., Clements, J. and R. Klamt. 2003. North Coast Watershed Assessment Program
Methods Manual. California Resources Agency and California Environmental
Protection Agency, Sacramento, California. 191 pages. PDF
70.
Dai, J.J., S. Lorenzato, and D.M. Rocke 2004. A
knowledge-based model of watershed assessment for sediment. Environmental
Modelling & Software 19: 423–433. PDF
71.
Gallo, Kirsten;
Lanigan, Steven H.; Eldred, Peter; Gordon, Sean N.; Moyer, Chris. 2005.
Northwest Forest Plan—the first 10 years (1994–2003): preliminary assessment of
the condition of watersheds. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-647. Portland, OR: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
133 p. Download page
for PDF - in five parts
72.
Gordon, S., and
Gallo, K. 2011. Structuring expert input for a knowledge-based approach to
watershed condition assessment for the Northwest Forest Plan, USA.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 172(1): 643-661. PDF
73.
Reeves, Gordon,
H.; Hohler, David B.; Larsen, David P.; Busch, David
E.; Kratz, Kim; Reynolds, Keith; Stein, Karl F.; Atzet,
Thomas; Hays, Polly; Tehan, Michael. 2003. Aquatic
and riparian effectiveness monitoring program for the Northwest Forest Plan.
Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-577. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 80 p. PDF
74.
Reynolds, K.M.;
Peets, S. 2001. Integrated assessment and priorities for protection and restoration
of watersheds. Proceedings of the IUFRO 4.11 conference on forest biometry,
modeling and information science. 26–29 June 2001, Greenwich, UK. PDF
75.
Reynolds, K.M.,
Jensen, M., Andreasen, J., and Goodman, I. 2000. Knowledge-based assessment of
watershed condition. Comput Electron Agr 27:315–334. online
76.
Walker,R.,
C. Keithley, R. Henly, S. Downie,
and S. Cannata. 2007. Ecosystem Management Decision
Support (EMDS) applied to watershed assessment on California’s north coast.
Pages 25-34 in Standiford, R.B., G.A. Giusti, Y. Valachovic, W.J. Zielinski, and M.J. Furniss (eds.)
Proceedings of the Redwood Region Forest Science Symposium: What Does the
Future Hold? 15–17 March 2004, Rohnert Park, California. USDA Forest Service
Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-194. Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA. 553 p. PDF
77.
Gordon, S.N.
2014. Use of EMDS in Conservation and Management Planning for Watersheds.
Chapter 4 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron (eds). Decision Support for Environmental
Management: Applications of the Ecosystem Management Decision Support System.
Berlin: Springer. PDF
78.
Reynolds, K.M.,
P.J. Murphy, and Steven Paplanus. 2017. Toward geodesign
for watershed restoration on the Fremont-Winema
National Forest, Pacific Northwest, USA. Sustainability 9: 678. PDF
79.
Janssen, R., H. Goosena, M.L. Verhoevenb, J.T.A. Verhoevenb, A.Q.A. Omtzigta and
E. Maltby. 2005. Decision support for integrated wetland management.
Environmental Modelling and Software 30: 215-229. PDF
80.
Girvetz, E., and Shilling, F. 2003. Decision Support for
Road System Analysis and Modification on the Tahoe National Forest.
Environmental Management 32:218-233. PDF
81.
Heaton, J.S.,
K.E. Nussear, T.C. Esque,
R.D. Inman, F.M. Davenport, T.E. Leuteritz, P.A.
Medica, N.W. Strout, P.A. Burgess, and L. Benvenuti. 2008. Spatially explicit
decision support for selecting translocation areas for Mojave
desert tortoises. Biodiversity Conservation 17:575–590. PDF
82.
Leuteritz, Thomas E.J. 2006. Tortoises on the march:
modeling and GIS help relocate a threatened species. GeoWorld,
May 2006.
83.
Redlands
Institute Decision Support Team. 2004. Desert Tortoise habitat potential
knowledge base. Redlands Institute, Redlands, CA. 120 pp. PDF
84.
Wang, S.-F.,
C.-C. Cheng, C.-C. Chang. 2004b. Applying Ecosystem Management Decision Support
System on wildlife habitat suitability assessment. Jour. Exp. For. Nat. Taiwan
Univ. 19: 69-76. PDF (in
Chinese)
85.
Gordon, S.N., H.
McPherson, L. Dickson, J. Halofsky, C. Snyder, and
A.W. Brodie. 2014. Wildlife Habitat Management. Chapter 10 in Reynolds, K.M.,
P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). Decision Support for Environmental Management: Applications of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
86.
Wainwright,
T.C., P.W. Lawson, G.H. Reeves, L.A. Weitkamp, H.A.
Stout, and JS. Mills. 2014. Measuring Biological Sustainability via a Decision
Support System: Experiences with Oregon Coast Coho Salmon. Chapter 12 in
Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron (eds). Decision Support for Environmental
Management: Applications of the Ecosystem Management Decision Support System.
Berlin: Springer. PDF
87.
Hessburg, P., Reynolds, K., Keane, R., James, K., Salter,
R. 2008. Evaluating wildland fire danger and prioritizing vegetation and fuels
treatments. Forest Ecology and Management 247:1-17. PDF
88.
Gollnick-Waid, K., S. Goodman, B. Yohn,
J. Wallace, K. VanHemelryck, and G. Barnes. 2009.
Ecosystem Management and Decision Support, Summary of Fiscal Year 2009 Results,
Prepared for the National Interagency Fuels Coordination Group. Boise, ID: US
Department of the Interior. 28 p.
89.
Reynolds, K.M.,
P.F. Hessburg, R.E. Keane, and J.P. Menakis. 2009. Allocating fuel-treatment budgets: recent
federal experience with decision support. Forest Ecology and Management 258:
2373–2381. PDF
90.
Hessburg, P. F., K.M. Reynolds, R.E. Keane, K.M. James,
R.B. Salter. 2010. Evaluating wildland fire danger and prioritizing vegetation
and fuels treatments. Pages 329-352 in: Pye, J.M., H.M. Rauscher, Y. Sands,
D.C. Lee, and J.S. Beatty, tech. eds. Advances in threat assessment and their
application to forest and rangeland management. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-802.
Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest
and Southern Research Stations. PDF
91.
Keane, R.E., J. Menakis, P. Hessburg, K.
Reynolds, and J. Dickinson. 2014. Evaluating Wildland fire hazard and risk for
fire management applications. Chapter 6 in Reynolds, K.M., P.F. Hessburg, and P.S. Bourgeron
(eds). Decision Support for Environmental Management: Applications of the
Ecosystem Management Decision Support System. Berlin: Springer. PDF
92.
Gonzalez-Olabarria, J.R., K.M. Reynolds, A. Larrañaga,
E. Busquets, and M. Pique. 2019. Strategic and tactical planning to improve
suppression efforts against large forest fires in the Catalonia region of
Spain. Forest Ecology and management 432: 612-622. PDF